SONAL VIJ vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN — Cr.M.P./1353/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 420,120(B),403,406,327,383,387,506,IPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010254742025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./17070/2025
Filing Date
28-Jul-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1353/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONAL VIJ
Adv. SHUBHAM SINHA,NIPUN BAKSHI,NIPUN BAKSHI, ,NIPUN BAKSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN
-
2.M/S INDOBE VENTURES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY CUM OPERATIONAL MANAGER, ABHIMANUE KUMAR PANDEY
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary of Cr.M.P. No. 1353/2026: The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No. 2 (M/S Indobe Ventures). The petitioner Sonal Vij was directed to file requisites for service of notice via speed post and court process within six weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with case listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1353/2026
Summary of Cr.M.P. No. 1353/2026: The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No. 2 (M/S Indobe Ventures). The petitioner Sonal Vij was directed to file requisites for service of notice via speed post and court process within six weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with case listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts