DILIP SAO @ DILIP PRASAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — LPA/548/2025
Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010251582025
Filing Number
LPA/8305/2025
Filing Date
24-Jul-2025
Registration No
LPA/548/2025
Registration Date
04-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Clause 10 Of Letters Patent ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP SAO @ DILIP PRASAD
Adv. YOGENDRA PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAZARIBAG
-
3.LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, HAZARIBAG
-
4.CIRCLE OFFICER, BISHUNGARH
-
5.ROSHAN KUMAR PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of Dilip Sao's appeal by allowing him to withdraw it with liberty to apply afresh under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947, claiming displaced person status. The court also granted him liberty to pursue any other available legal remedies, subject to respondents' objections, while keeping all parties' contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
19-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. LPA/548/2025
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of Dilip Sao's appeal by allowing him to withdraw it with liberty to apply afresh under the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947, claiming displaced person status. The court also granted him liberty to pursue any other available legal remedies, subject to respondents' objections, while keeping all parties' contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts