THOMAS LUGUN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI, ,AALOK KUMAR,ABHISHEK CHOUDHARY,ANIL KUMAR,ANOOP KR MEHTA — JHHC10249092025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010249092025

Filing Number

WPC/8218/2025

Filing Date

23-Jul-2025

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THOMAS LUGUN

    Adv. SHIV PRASAD SINGH,BIRENDRA KUMAR,BIRENDRA KUMAR, ,BIRENDRA KUMAR

  2. 2.SUKRA ORAON

  3. 3.AGADHA KOGADO

  4. 4.ASRITA DEVI

  5. 5.DAMODAR RAVIDAS

  6. 6.NEMDHARI PRAJAPATI

  7. 7.SANO KUMAR

  8. 8.JAI KISHUN GANJHU

  9. 9.HABIL JADIA

  10. 10.GEETA DEVI

  11. 11.CHHATTU MANJHI

  12. 12.KALESHWAR PRAJAPATI

  13. 13.KHEMLAL BHUIYA

  14. 14.AGADHA KOGADO

  15. 15.GERALD BUND

  16. 16.MILAN PRAJAPATI

  17. 17.SURESH KUMAR RAVI

  18. 18.PRASAD BHUIYA

  19. 19.ETWARI HORO

  20. 20.DEEPAK GANJHU

  21. 21.BAJRANG MALLAH

  22. 22.GRACE MARY BAGE

  23. 23.SANTOSH KUMAR BHUIYA

  24. 24.SHIBU KUMAR

  25. 25.MRS. SUMIA DEVI

  26. 26.JAGMOHAN GANJHU

  27. 27.DEVANTI DEVI

  28. 28.KISHUN PRAJAPATI

  29. 29.CHAND MUNI DEVI

  30. 30.SANTOSH KUMAR

  31. 31.CHANDAN LAKRA

  32. 32.KHAKHUN RAVIDAS

  33. 33.SUMAN DEVI

  34. 34.CHETALAL RAVIDAS

  35. 35.MOHAN RAVIDAS

  36. 36.ARJUN RAVIDAS

  37. 37.DHANESHWARI DEVI

  38. 38.RAJU RAVIDAS

  39. 39.PRAKASH BHUIYAN

  40. 40.RAJKUMAR BHUIYAN

  41. 41.SUMITRA DEVI

  42. 42.MANOJ KUMAR

  43. 43.RAJESH KUMAR

  44. 44.UMESH KUMAR

  45. 45.MAHAVIR MUNDA

  46. 46.BINOD MUNDA

  47. 47.ANIL MUNDA

  48. 48.CHOTAN ORAWN

  49. 49.PUNAM LAKRA

  50. 50.UMESH PRAJAPATI

  51. 51.UPASI DEVI

  52. 52.ARTI DEVI

  53. 53.SUMITRA DEVI

  54. 54.SHIVCHARAN KUMAR

  55. 55.MANSU PRAJAPATI

  56. 56.RAJESH KUMAR

  57. 57.AJAY KUMAR

  58. 58.RAVI BHUIYAN

  59. 59.KAVI BHUIYAN

  60. 60.KABIYA DEVI

  61. 61.ARJUN BHUIYAN

  62. 62.SARJU BHUIYAN

  63. 63.BHOLA BHUIYAN

  64. 64.VICKY BHUIYAN

  65. 65.SUMMI KUMARI

  66. 66.MANOJ ORAWN

  67. 67.GEETA KUJUR

  68. 68.UMESH BHUIYAN

  69. 69.DHEERAJ GANJHU

  70. 70.SUBHASH GANJHU

  71. 71.BIRJA GANJHU

  72. 72.UMESH GANJHU

  73. 73.DHANESHWAR RAVIDAS

  74. 74.DEVNARAYAN KUMAR RAVI

  75. 75.SANJAY KUMAR

  76. 76.SHANTI DEVI

  77. 77.GEETA DEVI

  78. 78.WILLIUM MUNDA

  79. 79.ANMOL LUGUN

  80. 80.ETWARI DEVI

  81. 81.BIJAY ORAWN

  82. 82.NEHA DEVI

  83. 83.ASHOK BHUIYAN

  84. 84.SANJAY BHUIYAN

  85. 85.MANOJ KUMAR

  86. 86.VIKAS KUMAR

  87. 87.RANGEELA KUMAR

  88. 88.BHOLA MALLAH

  89. 89.FRANCIS JADIYA

  90. 90.MALTI DEVI

  91. 91.MITHLESH ORAWN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI, ,AALOK KUMAR,ABHISHEK CHOUDHARY,ANIL KUMAR,ANOOP KR MEHTA

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE OF SCHEDULED TRIBES AND OTHER TRADITIONAL FOREST

  3. 3.DEPARTMENT OF HOME, JAIL AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMGARH

  5. 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAMGARH

  6. 6.THE PROJECT OFFICER, TAPIN NORTH PROJECT, CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED

  7. 7.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED

  8. 8.THE MINING MANAGER, TAPIN NORTH PROJECT

  9. 9.THE MINISTRY OF COAL, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

  10. 10.THE MINISTRY OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

  11. 11.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HAZARIBAGH

  12. 12.OFFICER INCHARGE, CHARHI POLICE STATION

  13. 13.CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR

  14. 14.THE DIRECTOR (PERSONNEL), CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED

  15. 15.THE GENERAL MANAGER (P AND IR), CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: In W.P.(C) No. 8218 of 2025 before the Jharkhand High Court, the court dismissed the petitioners' application (I.A. No. 10095 of 2025) seeking exemption from court fees. The court held that since each petitioner would require individual rehabilitation orders, court fee exemption cannot be granted in a single order. The petitioners were directed to deposit the required court fees within three weeks, and the case was ordered to be registered immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Sep-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 23-Jul-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In W.P.(C) No. 8218 of 2025 before the Jharkhand High Court, the court dismissed the petitioners' application (I.A. No. 10095 of 2025) seeking exemption from court fees. The court held that since each petitioner would require individual rehabilitation orders, court fee exemption cannot be granted in a single order. The petitioners were directed to deposit the required court fees within three weeks, and the case was ordered to be registered immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case