DEO KISHORE THAKUR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI KERKETTA — Cont.(Cvl)/911/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010243672025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/8032/2025

Filing Date

18-Jul-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/911/2025

Registration Date

26-Jul-2025

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEO KISHORE THAKUR

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR,SHWETA SUMAN,SHWETA SUMAN, ,MAYANK DEEP,SHWETA SUMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI KERKETTA

  2. 2.MR. JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH, SECRETARY, LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT,

  3. 3.MR. RAVI RANJAN KUMAR VIKRAM, LABOUR COMMISSIONER, LABOUR APPOINTING AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.MR. PUNIT MINZ, LABOUR SUPERINTENDENT (AGRICULTURE LABOUR)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Outcome Summary: In Cont. Case (Civil) No. 911 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand observed that while a previous order had been passed, the monetary benefit awarded to petitioner Deo Kishore Thakur remained unpaid. The court granted three weeks' time to the State to file an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with the order, including payment of the monetary benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Dec-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  4. 08-Aug-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 01-Aug-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  6. 18-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/911/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Outcome Summary: In Cont. Case (Civil) No. 911 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand observed that while a previous order had been passed, the monetary benefit awarded to petitioner Deo Kishore Thakur remained unpaid. The court granted three weeks' time to the State to file an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with the order, including payment of the monetary benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case