RAHUL YADAV vs THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ED Advocate - AMIT KUMAR DAS, ,DR. (MRS.) VANDANA SINGH — Cr.M.P./2278/2025

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010237302025

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./15963/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./2278/2025

Registration Date

18-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Modification Matter ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL YADAV

    Adv. SABYASANCHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ED Advocate - AMIT KUMAR DAS, ,DR. (MRS.) VANDANA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Rahul Yadav's petition seeking modification of bail condition 7(c), which requires his appearance on every trial date. The court found him to be a flight risk based on his history of evading multiple PMLA summons (2022), leading to a non-bailable warrant, and surrendering only after the warrant was denied. The ED's arguments regarding his evasive conduct and unsubstantiated claims about fund sources were deemed credible, making the modification request misconceived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 01-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  14. 04-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  15. 28-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  16. 21-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  17. 14-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  18. 07-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  19. 30-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

  20. 30-Oct-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  21. 16-Oct-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  23. 25-Sep-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  24. 18-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  25. 18-Sep-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  26. 11-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  27. 04-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  28. 29-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./2278/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Rahul Yadav's petition seeking modification of bail condition 7(c), which requires his appearance on every trial date. The court found him to be a flight risk based on his history of evading multiple PMLA summons (2022), leading to a non-bailable warrant, and surrendering only after the warrant was denied. The ED's arguments regarding his evasive conduct and unsubstantiated claims about fund sources were deemed credible, making the modification request misconceived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case