DEEP NARAYAN SINGH vs RADHA DEVI — C.M.P./457/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010235652025
Filing Number
C.M.P./7705/2025
Filing Date
14-Jul-2025
Registration No
C.M.P./457/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
ARTICLE-227 ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEP NARAYAN SINGH
Adv. BAKSHI VIBHA
-
2.ROHIT NARAYAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.RADHA DEVI
-
2.GANESH RAM
-
3.DINESH RAM
-
4.NARESH RAM
-
5.RAJU RAM
-
6.TITU RA
-
7.BELU DEVI
-
8.SHANKAR RAM
-
9.VIJOY RAM
-
10.MOST. SUMA
-
11.SANTOSH RAM ALIAS DHAPRN
-
12.PARASH RAM
-
13.SHASHI DEVI
-
14.KUSUM DEVI
-
15.SUSHMA DEVI
-
16.PINKI DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary: In C.M.P. No. 7705 of 2025, the petitioners were directed to remove defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within four weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. In C.M.P. No. 457 of 2026, notice was issued to opposite parties 1-16, and the petitioners were directed to file requisites for service of notice within six weeks, with the rule made returnable in the same period, failing which the petition would be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C.M.P./457/2026
Summary: In C.M.P. No. 7705 of 2025, the petitioners were directed to remove defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within four weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed. In C.M.P. No. 457 of 2026, notice was issued to opposite parties 1-16, and the petitioners were directed to file requisites for service of notice within six weeks, with the rule made returnable in the same period, failing which the petition would be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts