BABU LAL YADAV vs KAILA GOPE ALIAS KALIA GOPE Advocate - SAHADEO CHOUDHARY, ,SHOBHA RANI,SAHADEO CHOUDHARY,SAHADEO CHOUDHARY,SHIV PRASAD — C.M.P./100/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010227912025
Filing Number
C.M.P./7420/2025
Filing Date
08-Jul-2025
Registration No
C.M.P./100/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION. ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABU LAL YADAV
Adv. RAHUL KR GUPTA
-
2.SHAMBHU YADAV
-
3.DWARIKA YADAV
-
4.MURLI YADAV
-
5.SANTARWA DEVI
-
6.BUNDHIYA DEVI
-
7.SARSWATI DEVI
-
8.JAMUNI DEVI
-
9.SAHDEO MAHTO
-
10.BHADO DEVI
-
11.SHANTI DEVI
-
12.BANOUDHI MAHTO
-
13.JAGDISH MAHTO
-
14.ARJUN MAHTO
-
15.MOSOMAT GENDIA
-
16.DINESHWAR YADAV
-
17.KULDEEP YADAV
-
18.SHANTI DEVI
-
19.BASWA DEVI
-
20.CHHATTU GOPE
-
21.DULARCHAND GOPE
-
22.MEGHANI DEVI
-
23.GAURI DEVI
-
24.PACHIA DEVI
-
25.DHANIA DEVI
-
26.TULSI MAHTO
-
27.RAMESHWAR MAHTO
-
28.ARJUN MAHTO
-
29.SOBHIYA DEVI
-
30.PULWA DEVI
-
31.KAUSHALYA DEVI
-
32.JEHLI DEVI
-
33.THAMBHIYA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAILA GOPE ALIAS KALIA GOPE Advocate - SAHADEO CHOUDHARY, ,SHOBHA RANI,SAHADEO CHOUDHARY,SAHADEO CHOUDHARY,SHIV PRASAD
-
2.RESHO GOPE ALIAS KAILASH GOPE
-
3.ETWARI GOPE
-
4.DULARI DEVI
-
5.MOSOMAT AKALI
-
6.SHANKARI DEVI
-
7.SOMARI DEVI
-
8.DUKHANI DEVI
-
9.NIRIYA DEVI
-
10.PACHIYA DEVI
-
11.TIPANI MOSSOMAT
-
12.SARJU RANA
-
13.MITANI DEVI
-
14.TOKAN MAHTO
-
15.BISHANI DEVI
-
16.BISHUN MAHTO
-
17.TULSI GOPE
-
18.MOSOMAT MANGARI
-
19.BISHNI DEVI
-
20.HULASH GOPE
-
21.KISHUN RANA
-
22.BASUDEO RANA
-
23.MEGHLAL RANA
-
24.MASOMAT BUDHANI DEVI
-
25.MUNSHI YADAV
-
26.KAILA YADAV
-
27.CHATRADHARI YADAV
-
28.NARAYAN YADAV
-
29.TULSI YADAV
-
30.RAMESHWAR YADAV
-
31.ARJUN YADAV
-
32.FULUA DEVI
-
33.SAGIA DEVI
-
34.KAUSHLYA DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: C.M.P. No.100/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand found that multiple opposite parties (Nos. 5, 8, 11-14, 16-18, 20-24) have died. The petitioners are directed to file a supplementary affidavit within six weeks explaining why the petition should not be dismissed for being filed against deceased persons, or face automatic dismissal. Additionally, fresh notice must be issued to opposite parties 15 and 19 (previously unserved), with petitioners required to file fresh service requisites within one week or face dismissal. The rule is made returnable in six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
12-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C.M.P./100/2026
Case Summary: C.M.P. No.100/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand found that multiple opposite parties (Nos. 5, 8, 11-14, 16-18, 20-24) have died. The petitioners are directed to file a supplementary affidavit within six weeks explaining why the petition should not be dismissed for being filed against deceased persons, or face automatic dismissal. Additionally, fresh notice must be issued to opposite parties 15 and 19 (previously unserved), with petitioners required to file fresh service requisites within one week or face dismissal. The rule is made returnable in six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts