ASHOK SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — Cont.(Cvl)/1207/2025
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010220792025
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/7123/2025
Filing Date
03-Jul-2025
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/1207/2025
Registration Date
24-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 15-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK SINGH
Adv. AMAR KUMAR SINHA,SACHIN VERMA,SACHIN VERMA, ,SUMIT KUMAR,ANURAG CHANDRA,SACHIN VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR
-
2.SRI RAM NARAYAN SINGH, ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, RANCHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dropped the contempt proceeding against the Additional Collector, finding that the earlier court order had been substantially complied with through a committee recommendation rejecting the petitioner's land compensation claim on grounds of suspicious documents. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to separately challenge the committee's rejection recommendation before the Deputy Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
16-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
26-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/1207/2025
The High Court of Jharkhand dropped the contempt proceeding against the Additional Collector, finding that the earlier court order had been substantially complied with through a committee recommendation rejecting the petitioner's land compensation claim on grounds of suspicious documents. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to separately challenge the committee's rejection recommendation before the Deputy Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts