MOST ETO ORAIN vs SUKRA ORAON Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR, ,RAJESH KUMAR,SANJIT KUMAR,SANJAY KUMAR THAKUR — C.M.P./1098/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010220522025

Filing Number

C.M.P./7107/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

C.M.P./1098/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

RESTORATION. ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOST ETO ORAIN

    Adv. Md. Azam

  2. 2.PANCHU ORAON

  3. 3.SANJEET ORAON

  4. 4.SANJAY ORAON

  5. 5.LELWA ORAON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKRA ORAON Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR, ,RAJESH KUMAR,SANJIT KUMAR,SANJAY KUMAR THAKUR

  2. 2.JOGENDRA ORAON

  3. 3.BANDHNA ORAON

  4. 4.GIRISH NATH MISHRA

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RANCHI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: C.M.P. 1098/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand condoned a 146-day delay in filing a civil miscellaneous petition for restoration of S.A. No. 466 of 2018, attributing the delay to inadvertent oversight by the advocate's clerk in depositing Rs. 8,000 with JHALSA. The court issued notice to opposite parties 2 and 4, directing petitioners to file notice requisites via speed post and court process within four weeks or face automatic dismissal, with the rule returnable in six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  5. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./1098/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.M.P. 1098/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand condoned a 146-day delay in filing a civil miscellaneous petition for restoration of S.A. No. 466 of 2018, attributing the delay to inadvertent oversight by the advocate's clerk in depositing Rs. 8,000 with JHALSA. The court issued notice to opposite parties 2 and 4, directing petitioners to file notice requisites via speed post and court process within four weeks or face automatic dismissal, with the rule returnable in six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case