RANA PRATAP SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO — Cont.(Cvl)/579/2024
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 18th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010208812024
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/5986/2024
Filing Date
24-Jun-2024
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/579/2024
Registration Date
27-Jun-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 15-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANA PRATAP SINGH
Adv. AMIT SINHA,NEETA KRISHNA,NEETA KRISHNA, ,MANISH KUMAR,SHUBHAM MAYANK,UTKARSH KRISHNA,PRATYUSH SHOUNIKYA,JAY SHANKAR TIWARY,NEETA KRISHNA
-
2.BACHCHU PRASAD SINGH
-
3.MD SHAHID ANSARI
-
4.BINOD PRASAD SINGH
-
5.GANESH PRASAD SINGH
-
6.NARENDRA PRASAD SAH
-
7.SHYAM PRASAD SINGH
-
8.HARI MOHAN SINGH
-
9.ARUN CHARAN DWARI
-
10.BHAGIRATH SINGH
-
11.JANARDAN PRASAD SINGH
-
12.YADUNANDAN YADAV
-
13.SARBANAND SINGH
-
14.JAIDEO YADAV
-
15.LAL MOHAN PATHAK
-
16.MAHABIR PATEL
-
17.RAMAKANT PRASAD SINGH
-
18.BAKHORI SINGH
-
19.GOPAL SINGH
-
20.SURYA VANSHI MAHATO
-
21.MD AQUIL AHMAD
-
22.MISRI PRASAD
-
23.RAM BABU RAM
-
24.RAM RIJAN PRASAD SAH
-
25.BADRI NARAYAN SINGH
-
26.NAGESHWAR THAKUR
-
27.INDRAJEET SINGH
-
28.RAGHUBANS PRASAD SINGH
-
29.LALAN SINGH
-
30.RAMAKANT RAI
-
31.VIJAY SHARMA
-
32.RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH
-
33.SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH
-
34.MD ABU SALEH
-
35.ABDUL KARIM
-
36.PALTU RAM
-
37.GOPAL LAL
-
38.JAMUNA SINGH
-
39.MADHAV SHARMA
-
40.GUNA NAND CHAUDHARY
-
41.MOTI LAL RAI
-
42.GOPAL PRASAD SINGH
-
43.NANDLAL KAPARIYA
-
44.LALAN KUMAR RAY
-
45.RAMDEO YADAV
-
46.RAMANAND SINGH
-
47.BHIM SEN SINGH
-
48.RAM SUHAWAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO
-
2.KRIPA NAND JHA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPTT OF TRANSPORT , GOVT OF JHARKHAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt petition against the Principal Secretary of Transport for alleged non-compliance with a January 2024 order regarding salary arrears and pension disbursement to 48 petitioners. The court found substantial compliance: all arrears were paid, 12 petitioners received pension approvals, and 32 others' pension papers were submitted to the Accountant General, with a commitment to disburse remaining pensions within six weeks. The court reserved liberty for petitioners to file fresh contempt proceedings if payment deadlines are missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
30-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
20-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
01-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
06-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/579/2024
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt petition against the Principal Secretary of Transport for alleged non-compliance with a January 2024 order regarding salary arrears and pension disbursement to 48 petitioners. The court found substantial compliance: all arrears were paid, 12 petitioners received pension approvals, and 32 others' pension papers were submitted to the Accountant General, with a commitment to disburse remaining pensions within six weeks. The court reserved liberty for petitioners to file fresh contempt proceedings if payment deadlines are missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts