RAJESHWAR DAYAL vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY, ,RAJIV RANJAN — JHHC10208602025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010208602025
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./14149/2025
Filing Date
24-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHWAR DAYAL
Adv. JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR, ,NEEHARIKA MAZUMDAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY, ,RAJIV RANJAN
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted petitioner Rajeshwar Dayal's exemption from surrendering before the trial court in Complaint Case No. 2621 of 2019. The court found sufficient cause for exemption based on a compromise settlement between the petitioner and opposite party no.2, wherein Rs. 11,00,000 had been transferred to the opposite party's account, which was accepted by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
24-Jun-2025
Case filed
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted petitioner Rajeshwar Dayal's exemption from surrendering before the trial court in Complaint Case No. 2621 of 2019. The court found sufficient cause for exemption based on a compromise settlement between the petitioner and opposite party no.2, wherein Rs. 11,00,000 had been transferred to the opposite party's account, which was accepted by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts