RAMJEE PRASAD VERMA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO — WPC/3706/2024
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010203042024
Filing Number
WPC/5812/2024
Filing Date
20-Jun-2024
Registration No
WPC/3706/2024
Registration Date
24-Jun-2024
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Sub-Category
Encroachment Matter ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMJEE PRASAD VERMA
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINHA,ANSHUMAN KUMAR,ANSHUMAN KUMAR, ,MICKY KUMARI,ANSHUMAN KUMAR
-
2.LAKHAN YADAV
-
3.GULAM RASOOL
-
4.CHHOTTU YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KODERMA
-
3.CIRCLE OFFICER-CUM-COLLECTOR LAND ENCROACHMENT, KODERMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice issued under the Bihar (Jharkhand) Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956. The court found the notice was issued with proper jurisdiction and was not vague, and therefore declined to entertain the petition, directing the petitioners to appear and participate in the encroachment proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Sep-2024
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
20-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3706/2024
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice issued under the Bihar (Jharkhand) Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956. The court found the notice was issued with proper jurisdiction and was not vague, and therefore declined to entertain the petition, directing the petitioners to appear and participate in the encroachment proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts