BANGALI MAHTO vs KARMU MAHTO ALIAS KARU MAHTO — C.M.P./795/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010201192025

Filing Number

C.M.P./6451/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

C.M.P./795/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

RESTORATION. ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANGALI MAHTO

    Adv. AISHWARYA PRAKASH

  2. 2.KISTO MAHTO

  3. 3.PARAS NATH MAHTO

  4. 4.NUNU MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARMU MAHTO ALIAS KARU MAHTO

  2. 2.SMT. SAMRI DEVI

  3. 3.SAHBAHIA DEVI

  4. 4.SMT. SUJANNI DEVI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP/795/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand found that the notice previously issued to Opposite Parties 1-4 regarding limitation was not validly served. The court ordered the petitioners to file fresh notice requisites through both speed post and court process within two weeks, failing which the petition will be dismissed. The case was made returnable within six weeks and will be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 29-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  5. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./795/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP/795/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand found that the notice previously issued to Opposite Parties 1-4 regarding limitation was not validly served. The court ordered the petitioners to file fresh notice requisites through both speed post and court process within two weeks, failing which the petition will be dismissed. The case was made returnable within six weeks and will be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case