ARUN KUMAR RAUT(Legal Heir) vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THR THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN — LPA/332/2025

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010197832025

Filing Number

LPA/6329/2025

Filing Date

17-Jun-2025

Registration No

LPA/332/2025

Registration Date

28-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Clause 10 Of Letters Patent ( 24 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR RAUT(Legal Heir)

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR,PRATIBHA MAHTO,PRATIBHA MAHTO, ,PRATYUSH,PRATIBHA MAHTO1.

  2. 2.Amrita Ray,aged about 49 yrs w/o late Arun Kumar Raut1.

  3. 3.Anupriya Kumari, 26 yrs, D/o Late Arun Kumar Raut1.

  4. 4.Anubhav Kumar Raut, 20 yrs, s/o late Arun Kumar Raut1.

  5. 5.Anuradha Kumari, 25 yrs, D/o late Arun Kumar Raut

  6. 6.RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

  7. 7.ASHISH KUMAR GANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THR THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN

  2. 2.THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER, SANTHAL PARGANA DIVISION

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DUMKA

  6. 6.THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, DUMKA

  7. 7.THE IN-CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, AT JARMUNDI

  8. 8.THE IN-CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, AT MASALIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    Summary of LPA/332/2025 - Jharkhand High Court The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal of employees who were terminated in October 1993, ordering regularization of their services with all consequential benefits. Following the precedent set in a similar case (LPA 254/2022), the court granted relief including death-cum-retirement benefits to the legal representatives of the deceased appellant. The appellants, who were reinstated in 2010 and continued in service, are now entitled to full service regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    High on Board

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 17-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/332/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of LPA/332/2025 - Jharkhand High Court The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal of employees who were terminated in October 1993, ordering regularization of their services with all consequential benefits. Following the precedent set in a similar case (LPA 254/2022), the court granted relief including death-cum-retirement benefits to the legal representatives of the deceased appellant. The appellants, who were reinstated in 2010 and continued in service, are now entitled to full service regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case