ADIL KERKETTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO — B.A./5441/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),311,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010195492026

Filing Number

B.A./12860/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

B.A./5441/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),311,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADIL KERKETTA

    Adv. MD. ZAID AHMED,AMAN ALI,AMAN ALI, ,AMAN ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. 5441/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Adil Kerketta, accused of dacoity and assault at a church (BNS sections 310(2) and 311), after he spent over a year in jail custody. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, noting that a co-accused with similar charges was already admitted to bail, and the petitioner agreed to cooperate with trial proceedings without harassing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5441/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. 5441/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Adil Kerketta, accused of dacoity and assault at a church (BNS sections 310(2) and 311), after he spent over a year in jail custody. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, noting that a co-accused with similar charges was already admitted to bail, and the petitioner agreed to cooperate with trial proceedings without harassing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case