BIRSA PAHAN @ BIRSA PHAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA — B.A./5435/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010194632026
Filing Number
B.A./12794/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
B.A./5435/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIRSA PAHAN @ BIRSA PHAN
Adv. AJEET KUMAR SINGH,Rahul Aditya,Rahul Aditya, ,Rahul Aditya
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Birsa Pahan, accused of murdering Gouri Devi and Kanu Munda under Section 103(1) 3(5) BNS. Though not named in the FIR, he was implicated based on his confessional statement and had been in custody since November 25, 2025. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary released him on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, conditional on cooperating with trial, providing contact details, and not harassing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5435/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Birsa Pahan, accused of murdering Gouri Devi and Kanu Munda under Section 103(1) 3(5) BNS. Though not named in the FIR, he was implicated based on his confessional statement and had been in custody since November 25, 2025. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary released him on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, conditional on cooperating with trial, providing contact details, and not harassing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts