BUDHAN LAL MUNDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — B.A./5422/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18(b),NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010192082026

Filing Number

B.A./12606/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

B.A./5422/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18(b),NDPS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUDHAN LAL MUNDA

    Adv. GAURAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. 5422/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Budhan Lal Munda, accused of poppy cultivation under NDPS Act Section 18(b), after he was in custody for four months. The court found that no incriminating articles were recovered, the petitioner had no criminal history, and granted bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5422/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. 5422/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Budhan Lal Munda, accused of poppy cultivation under NDPS Act Section 18(b), after he was in custody for four months. The court found that no incriminating articles were recovered, the petitioner had no criminal history, and granted bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case