SARJAM BODRA @ SARJOM BODRA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO — B.A./5426/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109(1),118(2),126(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010191922026

Filing Number

B.A./12592/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

B.A./5426/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109(1),118(2),126(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARJAM BODRA @ SARJOM BODRA

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR, ,SHARADA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 5426/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sarjam Bodra, accused of attempted murder under BNS sections 109(1), 118(2), and 126(2). Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found that the informant's injuries were simple in nature, the petitioner had no criminal history, and had been in custody since August 2025. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and providing mobile/Aadhar details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 5426/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sarjam Bodra, accused of attempted murder under BNS sections 109(1), 118(2), and 126(2). Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found that the informant's injuries were simple in nature, the petitioner had no criminal history, and had been in custody since August 2025. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and providing mobile/Aadhar details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case