SONU RAM vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — A.B.A./3147/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(c),IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010191322026
Filing Number
A.B.A./12562/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./3147/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FOREST ( 137 )
Sub-Category
Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONU RAM
Adv. ANUPAM ANAND,PRANAV KUMAR,PRANAV KUMAR, ,PRANAV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. /3147/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sonu Ram, aged 29, who faced apprehension of arrest in a forest offence case (Complaint Case No. 233 of 2021) involving alleged cultivation of poppy plants on forest department land under Section 33(1)(C) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioner contended the allegations were false and the land did not belong to him, while the State opposed the bail prayer. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi approved anticipatory bail considering the circumstances, directing the petitioner to surrender within three weeks and to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard conditions under the BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./3147/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. /3147/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sonu Ram, aged 29, who faced apprehension of arrest in a forest offence case (Complaint Case No. 233 of 2021) involving alleged cultivation of poppy plants on forest department land under Section 33(1)(C) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioner contended the allegations were false and the land did not belong to him, while the State opposed the bail prayer. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi approved anticipatory bail considering the circumstances, directing the petitioner to surrender within three weeks and to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard conditions under the BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts