NITISH KUMAR @ NITISH KUSHWAHA @ KELA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY, ,SOURAV RAJ SHARMA,XENIA DHAR,SHASHANK SHEKHAR No.3,SHAILESH PODDAR — B.A./5305/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),126(2),115(2),117(2),118(2),324(4),324(6),109(1),103(1),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010190512026
Filing Number
B.A./12510/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
B.A./5305/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITISH KUMAR @ NITISH KUSHWAHA @ KELA
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR SONI,MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY,MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ,MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY, ,SOURAV RAJ SHARMA,XENIA DHAR,SHASHANK SHEKHAR No.3,SHAILESH PODDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. No. 5305/2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Nitish Kumar's bail petition. The court found that the eyewitness account from injured victim Kuldeep Soni directly implicating the petitioner in the murder of Suraj Rana and attempted murder of two others, combined with risks of absconding and evidence tampering, made this an unfit case for bail. A co-accused's similar bail rejection was also considered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5305/2026
Case Summary: B.A. No. 5305/2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Nitish Kumar's bail petition. The court found that the eyewitness account from injured victim Kuldeep Soni directly implicating the petitioner in the murder of Suraj Rana and attempted murder of two others, combined with risks of absconding and evidence tampering, made this an unfit case for bail. A co-accused's similar bail rejection was also considered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts