MD. RIYAZ vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — A.B.A./3035/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 379,414,467,468,471,IPC,54,JMMC,RULES. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010190322026

Filing Number

A.B.A./12500/2026

Filing Date

06-Jun-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./3035/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )

Sub-Category

Mines and Minerals Concession Rules 1960 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 379,414,467,468,471,IPC,54,JMMC,RULES

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. RIYAZ

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR,NIRAJ KUMAR,NIRAJ KUMAR, ,AGNIVESH,NIRAJ KUMAR

  2. 2.MD. AKIL AKHTAR

  3. 3.MD. PHAIYAZ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (truck owners/drivers) accused of illegally transporting minerals using forged challans under IPC sections 379, 414, 467, 468, 471 and J.M.M.R Act section 54. The court found that petitioners had no criminal antecedents, co-accused received similar bail, and mineral nature was undisclosed, warranting bail. Each petitioner must surrender within three weeks and furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./3035/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (truck owners/drivers) accused of illegally transporting minerals using forged challans under IPC sections 379, 414, 467, 468, 471 and J.M.M.R Act section 54. The court found that petitioners had no criminal antecedents, co-accused received similar bail, and mineral nature was undisclosed, warranting bail. Each petitioner must surrender within three weeks and furnish Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case