GOPAL ORAON vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR, ,SWEETY TOPNO — C.M.P./525/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010190182025
Filing Number
C.M.P./6085/2025
Filing Date
11-Jun-2025
Registration No
C.M.P./525/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION. ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL ORAON
Adv. AJEET KUMAR SINGH
-
2.SOMRA ORAON
-
3.BIRSAMUNI KUMARI @ BIRSAMUNI BECK
-
4.PROMOD ORAON
-
5.ALKA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR, ,SWEETY TOPNO
-
2.SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORM
-
3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GUMLA
-
4.DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORM, GUMLA
-
5.DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AT GUMLA
-
6.CHAIR PERSON OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
-
7.REGIONAL HEAD OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY RANCHI, JHARKHAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The Jharkhand High Court allowed the restoration petition filed by five residents of village Pandaria who sought to revive their dismissed writ petition (WP(C) No. 1030 of 2023) concerning land acquisition matters. The court accepted the petitioners' assurance to cure procedural defects within four weeks and restored the original writ petition to its file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Admission
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
26-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C.M.P./525/2026
The Jharkhand High Court allowed the restoration petition filed by five residents of village Pandaria who sought to revive their dismissed writ petition (WP(C) No. 1030 of 2023) concerning land acquisition matters. The court accepted the petitioners' assurance to cure procedural defects within four weeks and restored the original writ petition to its file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts