ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH THE LEGAL MANAGER SRI AMIT JAISWAL vs PRIYANKA KUMARI Advocate - VISHAL KUMAR BINAY, ,ANIKET RANJAN — MA/274/2025

Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173(1). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: JHHC010189892025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

MA/6074/2025

Filing Date

10-06-2025

Registration No

MA/274/2025

Registration Date

29-07-2025

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MOTOR VEHICLE ( 152 )

Sub-Category

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173(1)

Petitioner(s)

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH THE LEGAL MANAGER SRI AMIT JAISWAL

Adv. NIKHIL RANJAN

Respondent(s)

PRIYANKA KUMARI Advocate - VISHAL KUMAR BINAY, ,ANIKET RANJAN

SUPRIYA KUMARI (MINOR)

SANJEET KUMAR (MINOR)

SUNITA DEVI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

08-08-2025

Admission

22-08-2025

Admission

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Summary: MA/274/2025 - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Priyanka Kumari & Others The High Court of Jharkhand partially allowed ICICI Lombard's appeal, finding the tribunal awarded inadequate consortium compensation. The court held that consortium should be Rs. 48,000 per claimant (total Rs. 1,44,000), not the Rs. 30,000 awarded, and ordered the insurer to deposit an additional Rs. 64,000 with 6% interest within four weeks. The court upheld the tribunal's determination of the deceased laborer's income at Rs. 500/day as reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: MA/274/2025 - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Priyanka Kumari & Others The High Court of Jharkhand partially allowed ICICI Lombard's appeal, finding the tribunal awarded inadequate consortium compensation. The court held that consortium should be Rs. 48,000 per claimant (total Rs. 1,44,000), not the Rs. 30,000 awarded, and ordered the insurer to deposit an additional Rs. 64,000 with 6% interest within four weeks. The court upheld the tribunal's determination of the deceased laborer's income at Rs. 500/day as reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case