IRFAN SHEKH ALIAS FARUKH SHEKH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA — B.A./5444/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010189702026

Filing Number

B.A./12463/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

B.A./5444/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IRFAN SHEKH ALIAS FARUKH SHEKH

    Adv. GAUTAM KUMAR,BIRAT KUMAR,BIRAT KUMAR, ,BIRAT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Irfan Shekh, aged 22, who was accused of murdering Kaila Pahariya under Section 103(1) BNS 2023. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and was implicated primarily on suspicion with only a confessional statement leading to weapon recovery. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Irfan Shekh, aged 22, who was accused of murdering Kaila Pahariya under Section 103(1) BNS 2023. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and was implicated primarily on suspicion with only a confessional statement leading to weapon recovery. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case