SUNIL KUMAR SAO ALIAS SUNIL KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — A.B.A./3034/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 7,ESS,COM,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010188932026
Filing Number
A.B.A./12403/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./3034/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ( 131 )
Sub-Category
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR SAO ALIAS SUNIL KUMAR
Adv. ANIKET JAISWAL,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR, ,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,RAHUL RANJAN,ROHAN MAZUMDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Sunil Kumar Sao in an Essential Commodities Act case involving alleged illegal transport of 14 LPG cylinders. The court found the FIR lacked clarity on the petitioner's involvement, noting he was neither owner nor driver of the tempo and his signature was absent from seizure documents. Given his clean criminal record and weak prosecution evidence, the court directed him to surrender within three weeks and granted bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./3034/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Sunil Kumar Sao in an Essential Commodities Act case involving alleged illegal transport of 14 LPG cylinders. The court found the FIR lacked clarity on the petitioner's involvement, noting he was neither owner nor driver of the tempo and his signature was absent from seizure documents. Given his clean criminal record and weak prosecution evidence, the court directed him to surrender within three weeks and granted bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts