RANJIT PASWAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHREE PRAKASH JHA — A.B.A./3105/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 306,34,IPC.3,4,PWDP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010188802026
Filing Number
A.B.A./12396/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./3105/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Prevention of Witch(DAAIN) Practices Act ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANJIT PASWAN
Adv. MANISH YADAV
-
2.RAMESH PRAJAPATI ALIAS RAMA PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHREE PRAKASH JHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Ranjit Paswan and Ramesh Prajapati in a case alleging they called a deceased woman "Daain" (witch), leading to her suicide, under IPC sections 306/34 and Prevention of Witchcraft Practices Act sections 3/4. The court found general and omnibus allegations against all accused, and crucially, the primary witness (PW-1) testified that the petitioners were not involved and their names appeared inadvertently in the FIR. Each petitioner was released on Rs.25,000 bail with two sureties, ordered to surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./3105/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Ranjit Paswan and Ramesh Prajapati in a case alleging they called a deceased woman "Daain" (witch), leading to her suicide, under IPC sections 306/34 and Prevention of Witchcraft Practices Act sections 3/4. The court found general and omnibus allegations against all accused, and crucially, the primary witness (PW-1) testified that the petitioners were not involved and their names appeared inadvertently in the FIR. Each petitioner was released on Rs.25,000 bail with two sureties, ordered to surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts