SANTOSH KUMAR PRADHAN ALIAS KANHU PRADHAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH — Cr.M.P./1695/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 414,34,IPC,11,POCTA,ACT,12(1)(2),JBAPOS,ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010186682026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./12237/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1695/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals Act, 1960 ( 214 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 414,34,IPC,11,POCTA,ACT,12(1)(2),JBAPOS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR PRADHAN ALIAS KANHU PRADHAN

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1695/2026 filed by Santosh Kumar Pradhan for non-prosecution on 16.06.2026. The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls, while the State's counsel argued the petition lacked merit, demonstrating the petitioner's lack of diligence in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1695/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1695/2026 filed by Santosh Kumar Pradhan for non-prosecution on 16.06.2026. The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls, while the State's counsel argued the petition lacked merit, demonstrating the petitioner's lack of diligence in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case