SATISH KUMAR PANDIT vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — Cr.A(SJ)/494/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 148,341,307,353,385,387,506,149,IPC,25(I-A),26(2),35,ARMS,ACT,17,CLA,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010185872025
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/12644/2025
Filing Date
04-Jun-2025
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/494/2025
Registration Date
18-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATISH KUMAR PANDIT
Adv. AWANISH RANJAN MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
In Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 494 of 2025, appellant Satish Kumar Pandit filed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 4311 of 2026) seeking suspension of sentence and ad interim bail during pendency of the appeal. The appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, which was granted by Justice Rajesh Kumar. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
21-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar RaiView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/494/2025
In Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 494 of 2025, appellant Satish Kumar Pandit filed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 4311 of 2026) seeking suspension of sentence and ad interim bail during pendency of the appeal. The appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, which was granted by Justice Rajesh Kumar. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts