NARAYAN SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR, ,JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO — WPC/4069/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010184272026
Filing Number
WPC/6393/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/4069/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Sub-Category
Compensation Matter ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARAYAN SINGH
Adv. NIRAJ KUMAR MISHRA,SAPNA KUMARI,SAPNA KUMARI, ,ASHUTOSH ANAND NO (
-
2.,SAPNA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR, ,JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO
-
2.THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
-
3.JHARKHAND URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED (JUVNL) THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MNANAGING DIRECTOR
-
4.JHARKHAND URJA SANCHARAN NIGAM LIMITED (JUSNL) THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
-
5.POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (PGCIL), THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
-
6.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMGARH
-
7.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, PATRATU
-
8.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 220/132/33 K.V. SWITCHYARD, P.T.P.S., PATRATU
-
9.THE GENERAL MANAGER/PROJECT HEAD, M/S L AND T LTD.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petitioner's pleas to stop transmission line construction and tower erection, holding that under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, only adequate compensation is available. The court directed respondents to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks regarding compensation payment and land acquisition, while permitting them to proceed with compensation disbursement and acquisition initiation during the petition's pendency. Case adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/4069/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petitioner's pleas to stop transmission line construction and tower erection, holding that under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, only adequate compensation is available. The court directed respondents to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks regarding compensation payment and land acquisition, while permitting them to proceed with compensation disbursement and acquisition initiation during the petition's pendency. Case adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts