BANDHAN YADAV @ BANDHAN KUMAR REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN GHANSHYAM YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN — A.B.A./2988/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),85,140(3),3(5),BNS,3,4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010183732026
Filing Number
A.B.A./11989/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2988/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )
Sub-Category
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANDHAN YADAV @ BANDHAN KUMAR REPRESENTED THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN GHANSHYAM YADAV
Adv. SACHIN MAHATO, ,BHAIYA V. KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to 16-year-old Bandhan Yadav, a student accused in a dowry-related case involving allegations under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the petitioner's age, student status, and evidence that he was studying in a hostel 10 km away on the alleged date of occurrence justified bail despite state opposition. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and released on bail with Rs. 25,000 bond and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2988/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to 16-year-old Bandhan Yadav, a student accused in a dowry-related case involving allegations under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the petitioner's age, student status, and evidence that he was studying in a hostel 10 km away on the alleged date of occurrence justified bail despite state opposition. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and released on bail with Rs. 25,000 bond and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts