SUNIL TURI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — Cr.M.P./1689/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010183552026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./11971/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1689/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Modification Matter ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL TURI

    Adv. SAMAN AHMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: Petitioner Sunil Turi sought modification of bail conditions, claiming inability to provide a bailor and consequent continued incarceration despite an existing bail order. The High Court of Jharkhand directed the Superintendent of Police, Giridih to conduct an inquiry to verify whether the petitioner genuinely lacks a bailor, with a report due within ten days. The case was adjourned for two weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Sunil Turi sought modification of bail conditions, claiming inability to provide a bailor and consequent continued incarceration despite an existing bail order. The High Court of Jharkhand directed the Superintendent of Police, Giridih to conduct an inquiry to verify whether the petitioner genuinely lacks a bailor, with a report due within ten days. The case was adjourned for two weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case