PRANJAL SHARMA ALIAS PRANJAL KAUSHAL SHARMA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY, ,ANKIT VISHAL — A.B.A./3181/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 85,318(4),316(2),61,BNS,3,4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010183082026
Filing Number
A.B.A./11924/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./3181/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )
Sub-Category
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRANJAL SHARMA ALIAS PRANJAL KAUSHAL SHARMA
Adv. PRAKASH JHA,DILIP KUMAR,DILIP KUMAR, ,ANKIT APURVA,DILIP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY, ,ANKIT VISHAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Summary: In this anticipatory bail application, the Jharkhand High Court partially granted relief to Pranjal Sharma, accused of dowry-related offenses and cruelty under BNS Sections 85, 318(4), 316(2), 61, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while the wife alleged the petitioner forced her to demand flat-furnishing money from her parents, no torture allegations were substantiated. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within two weeks and directed the trial court to release him on appropriate bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./3181/2026
Summary: In this anticipatory bail application, the Jharkhand High Court partially granted relief to Pranjal Sharma, accused of dowry-related offenses and cruelty under BNS Sections 85, 318(4), 316(2), 61, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while the wife alleged the petitioner forced her to demand flat-furnishing money from her parents, no torture allegations were substantiated. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within two weeks and directed the trial court to release him on appropriate bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts