FAIZ ANSARI ALIAS FAIZ AALAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR — B.A./5096/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64(2),(m),BNS,6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010182542026

Filing Number

B.A./11870/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5096/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64(2),(m),BNS,6,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIZ ANSARI ALIAS FAIZ AALAM

    Adv. DURGA C. MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Faiz Ansari, who has been in custody since January 16, 2026, on charges under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident involving a minor victim on July 8, 2025. The court found specific and direct allegations against the petitioner, with the victim's statement recorded under BNSS Section 183, and determined that given the serious nature of child sexual abuse allegations, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5096/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Faiz Ansari, who has been in custody since January 16, 2026, on charges under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged incident involving a minor victim on July 8, 2025. The court found specific and direct allegations against the petitioner, with the victim's statement recorded under BNSS Section 183, and determined that given the serious nature of child sexual abuse allegations, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case