SHRAVAN MAHATO ALIAS BABA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRAFUL JOJO — B.A./5493/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010182372026
Filing Number
B.A./11855/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5493/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRAVAN MAHATO ALIAS BABA
Adv. ANKIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRAFUL JOJO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 5493/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Shravan Mahato, accused of robbery and assault under BNS Section 309(4), considering his prolonged custody since August 2025, that a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail, and his undertaking to cooperate with trial. The court set bail at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on his cooperation, providing contact details to the court, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5493/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 5493/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Shravan Mahato, accused of robbery and assault under BNS Section 309(4), considering his prolonged custody since August 2025, that a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail, and his undertaking to cooperate with trial. The court set bail at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on his cooperation, providing contact details to the court, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts