TAPASH GHOSH @ TAPAS BANGALI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI — B.A./5277/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 307,34,IPC,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010182242026

Filing Number

B.A./11842/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5277/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 307,34,IPC,27,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAPASH GHOSH @ TAPAS BANGALI

    Adv. JITENDRA NATH UPADHYAY, ,RAHUL KUMAR,HARSHIKHA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Tapash Ghosh, accused of attempted murder (IPC §307/304) and illegal firearms possession (Arms Act §27) in Mango P.S. Case No.438 of 2022, despite state opposition. The court ordered his release on Rs.25,000 bail bond with two sureties, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial proceedings, provide contact details, and refrain from witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Tapash Ghosh, accused of attempted murder (IPC §307/304) and illegal firearms possession (Arms Act §27) in Mango P.S. Case No.438 of 2022, despite state opposition. The court ordered his release on Rs.25,000 bail bond with two sureties, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial proceedings, provide contact details, and refrain from witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case