KAILA MANJHI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — B.A./5041/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302/201/34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010181892026

Filing Number

B.A./11807/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5041/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302/201/34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAILA MANJHI

    Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 5041/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Kaila Manjhi, accused in a murder case (IPC Sections 302/201/34), after his earlier bail plea was rejected. The court considered that 8 of 13 prosecution witnesses had been examined, a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail, the petitioner had no criminal history, and had been in custody since January 2024. Decision: Bail granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, conditional on cooperation with trial, providing mobile and Aadhar details, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5041/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 5041/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Kaila Manjhi, accused in a murder case (IPC Sections 302/201/34), after his earlier bail plea was rejected. The court considered that 8 of 13 prosecution witnesses had been examined, a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail, the petitioner had no criminal history, and had been in custody since January 2024. Decision: Bail granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, conditional on cooperation with trial, providing mobile and Aadhar details, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case