MD. ABID ALIAS MD. ABID HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — A.B.A./2986/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(C),IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010181492026

Filing Number

A.B.A./11783/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2986/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FOREST ( 137 )

Sub-Category

Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(C),IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. ABID ALIAS MD. ABID HUSSAIN

    Adv. RAJESH KR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. /2986/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to MD. Abid Hussain, who faced arrest under Section 33(1)(C) of the Indian Forest Act for alleged poppy cultivation on forest land. The court found the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and the disputed land belonged to the forest department, not the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2986/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. /2986/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to MD. Abid Hussain, who faced arrest under Section 33(1)(C) of the Indian Forest Act for alleged poppy cultivation on forest land. The court found the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and the disputed land belonged to the forest department, not the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to surrender within three weeks and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case