FARDIN MANDAL @ RAJ vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN — B.A./5227/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 305,331(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Closed on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010181442026
Filing Number
B.A./11779/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5227/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Closed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FARDIN MANDAL @ RAJ
Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR,SOURABH KUMAR DAS,SOURABH KUMAR DAS, ,SOURABH KUMAR DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Fardin Mandal, a 20-year-old accused of theft under sections 305/331(4) BNS 2023 in Kanke P.S. Case No.290 of 2025. The court found merit in his arguments that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely on a confessional statement, and that despite charge being framed, no witnesses had been examined after seven months of custody since December 2025. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperating with trial, providing mobile number and Aadhar Card, and not harassing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
12-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5227/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Fardin Mandal, a 20-year-old accused of theft under sections 305/331(4) BNS 2023 in Kanke P.S. Case No.290 of 2025. The court found merit in his arguments that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely on a confessional statement, and that despite charge being framed, no witnesses had been examined after seven months of custody since December 2025. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperating with trial, providing mobile number and Aadhar Card, and not harassing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts