ROHIT SHARMA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN — B.A./5101/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 326(G),324(5),333,61(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010181032026
Filing Number
B.A./11745/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5101/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT SHARMA
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH,NISHA SINGH,NISHA SINGH, ,NISHA SINGH
-
2.ANAND SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rohit Sharma (24) and Anand Sharma (18) in connection with arson and property damage charges under BNS 2023. The petitioners were accused of setting fire to a house and damaging property, allegedly in retaliation over a dowry death accusation. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary approved bail with Rs. 25,000 bond each, two sureties, and conditions requiring cooperation with trial, provision of contact details, and undertaking not to intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5101/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rohit Sharma (24) and Anand Sharma (18) in connection with arson and property damage charges under BNS 2023. The petitioners were accused of setting fire to a house and damaging property, allegedly in retaliation over a dowry death accusation. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary approved bail with Rs. 25,000 bond each, two sureties, and conditions requiring cooperation with trial, provision of contact details, and undertaking not to intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts