LUKAS LONGA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA — B.A./5062/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),103(1),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010180922026
Filing Number
B.A./11734/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5062/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LUKAS LONGA
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR GANJHU,ASHOK KUMAR GOEL,ASHOK KUMAR GOEL, ,ASHOK KUMAR GOEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 5062/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Lukas Longa's bail petition in a murder case. Longa was accused of murdering Manbodh Sahu in furtherance of common intention with co-accused persons under BNS sections covering murder and related offenses. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary denied bail, finding the allegations serious and concluding there was risk of absconding and evidence tampering, deeming it unfit for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5062/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 5062/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Lukas Longa's bail petition in a murder case. Longa was accused of murdering Manbodh Sahu in furtherance of common intention with co-accused persons under BNS sections covering murder and related offenses. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary denied bail, finding the allegations serious and concluding there was risk of absconding and evidence tampering, deeming it unfit for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts