MD. SABIR ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRAFUL JOJO — B.A./5037/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010180482026
Filing Number
B.A./11690/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5037/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. SABIR ANSARI
Adv. AVISHEK CHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRAFUL JOJO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Md. Sabir Ansari, accused of motorcycle theft under BNS 2023 Section 303(2), finding the allegations relied primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement with insufficient independent incriminating material. Ansari was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card, maintaining contact details, and undertaking not to disturb witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5037/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Md. Sabir Ansari, accused of motorcycle theft under BNS 2023 Section 303(2), finding the allegations relied primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement with insufficient independent incriminating material. Ansari was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card, maintaining contact details, and undertaking not to disturb witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts