SHUBHAM SONY ALIAS RAJA KUMAR SONY ALIAS SHUBHAM KUMAR ALIAS RAJA SONI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR, ,ANKIT APURVA,BHANU KUMAR No.1,RAHUL PANDEY — B.A./4965/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),80(2),61(2),BNS,3,4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010180102026
Filing Number
B.A./11667/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./4965/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )
Sub-Category
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHUBHAM SONY ALIAS RAJA KUMAR SONY ALIAS SHUBHAM KUMAR ALIAS RAJA SONI
Adv. MD. ZAID AHMED,AMAN ALI,AMAN ALI, ,AMAN ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR, ,ANKIT APURVA,BHANU KUMAR No.1,RAHUL PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Shubham Sony, accused of his wife's murder, on the grounds that the post-mortem report indicated death by asphyxia from hanging with no external or internal injuries, and only one of seven charge-sheeted witnesses had been examined despite the petitioner being in custody since April 2025. The court directed his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./4965/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Shubham Sony, accused of his wife's murder, on the grounds that the post-mortem report indicated death by asphyxia from hanging with no external or internal injuries, and only one of seven charge-sheeted witnesses had been examined despite the petitioner being in custody since April 2025. The court directed his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts