APURVA KETAN ALIAS GAURAV MISHRA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM — B.A./5045/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109,351(2),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010180072026
Filing Number
B.A./11664/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5045/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.APURVA KETAN ALIAS GAURAV MISHRA
Adv. AVNISH PRAKHAR,KRISHNA MURARI SINGH,KRISHNA MURARI SINGH, ,KRISHNA MURARI SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. No. 5045/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Apurva Ketan (alias Gaurav Mishra) in an attempted murder case where he was accused under BNS 2023 Sections 109, 351(2), 3(5) and Arms Act Section 27. The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, was implicated solely based on a co-accused's confessional statement, no one sustained injuries, and the co-accused had already been granted bail by a coordinate bench. The petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to cooperate with trial, provide mobile number and Aadhaar details, and not disturb witnesses or informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5045/2026
Case Summary: B.A. No. 5045/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Apurva Ketan (alias Gaurav Mishra) in an attempted murder case where he was accused under BNS 2023 Sections 109, 351(2), 3(5) and Arms Act Section 27. The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, was implicated solely based on a co-accused's confessional statement, no one sustained injuries, and the co-accused had already been granted bail by a coordinate bench. The petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to cooperate with trial, provide mobile number and Aadhaar details, and not disturb witnesses or informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts