RADHE SHYAM SHARMA vs STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD, A PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN Advocate - INDRAJIT SINHA — WPC/3979/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010180022026
Filing Number
WPC/6341/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/3979/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RADHE SHYAM SHARMA
Adv. SUNIL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD, A PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN Advocate - INDRAJIT SINHA
-
2.BOKARO STEEL PLANT, BOKARO, A UNIT OF STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD THRO.ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
3.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TOWN ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A UNIT OF STEEL AUTHORIY OF INDAI LTD,
-
4.THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER TOWN ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT,A UNIT OF STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDAI LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The writ petition filed by 79-year-old Radhe Shyam Sharma against Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Bokaro Steel Plant regarding an eviction order was dismissed as withdrawn on June 10, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application to challenge the eviction order before an appropriate forum instead, which the court granted with liberty to pursue alternative remedies subject to the law of limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3979/2026
The writ petition filed by 79-year-old Radhe Shyam Sharma against Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Bokaro Steel Plant regarding an eviction order was dismissed as withdrawn on June 10, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application to challenge the eviction order before an appropriate forum instead, which the court granted with liberty to pursue alternative remedies subject to the law of limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts