DULARI SOREN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — Cr.M.P./1702/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 47(a),EXCISE,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010179872026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./11653/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1702/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CUSTOM & EXCISE ( 122 )

Sub-Category

Excise (malt Liquors) Act,1890 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 47(a),EXCISE,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DULARI SOREN

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR DAS,SANKALP GOSWAMI,SANKALP GOSWAMI, ,MANMOHIT BHALLA,SANKALP GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

  2. 2.MD,GUFRAN, SUB.INSPECTOR(EXCISE) GHATSILA ANCHAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1702/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 and directed petitioner Dulari Soren to file service requisites within one week via speed post and court process, with dismissal threatened for non-compliance. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1702/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1702/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 and directed petitioner Dulari Soren to file service requisites within one week via speed post and court process, with dismissal threatened for non-compliance. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case