CHANDAN KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI — B.A./4947/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2),(b),111(3),111(4),319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2), 61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010178942026

Filing Number

B.A./11564/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4947/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )

Sub-Category

Cyber Crime ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2),(b),111(3),111(4),319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2), 61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDAN KUMAR DAS

    Adv. RAHUL RANJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Chandan Kumar Das, accused in a cybercrime case, on the basis that no victim had lodged a complaint. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety be a close relative and the accused remain present at all trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4947/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Chandan Kumar Das, accused in a cybercrime case, on the basis that no victim had lodged a complaint. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety be a close relative and the accused remain present at all trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case