FATU TUDU ALIAS RAMESH TUDU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA — B.A./5091/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64(2)(m),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010178882026

Filing Number

B.A./11558/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5091/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64(2)(m),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FATU TUDU ALIAS RAMESH TUDU

    Adv. MANOJ KR DASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Fatu Tudu's bail application in a rape case (Section 64(2)(m) BNS) where he has been in custody since September 2025. The court found that since trial proceedings are ongoing and the victim-witness has not yet been examined, bail was not warranted. The court directed the state to promptly produce remaining witnesses for expedited trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5091/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Fatu Tudu's bail application in a rape case (Section 64(2)(m) BNS) where he has been in custody since September 2025. The court found that since trial proceedings are ongoing and the victim-witness has not yet been examined, bail was not warranted. The court directed the state to promptly produce remaining witnesses for expedited trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case