DHIRAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — B.A./5052/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2),(b),308,BNS,25(I-b),a,26,35,ARMS,ACT,17,CLA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010178702026
Filing Number
B.A./11545/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5052/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHIRAJ KUMAR
Adv. AMAN KUMAR RAHUL,NAND KISHORE RAM,NAND KISHORE RAM, ,SONALI BHATTACHARJEE,NAND KISHORE RAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 5052/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Dhiraj Kumar, accused of PLFI extremism and illegal firearms possession, after he had been in custody since March 14, 2026. The court directed his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, provide mobile number and Aadhar details, refrain from changing contact information, and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5052/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 5052/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Dhiraj Kumar, accused of PLFI extremism and illegal firearms possession, after he had been in custody since March 14, 2026. The court directed his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, provide mobile number and Aadhar details, refrain from changing contact information, and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts