TETRA ORAON vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA — B.A./5115/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(2),3(5),,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010178632026

Filing Number

B.A./11540/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5115/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(2),3(5),,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TETRA ORAON

    Adv. ANSHUMAN,MR RAHUL DEV,MR RAHUL DEV, ,RAGINI OJHA,PRIYANSHU NILESH,AYUSH PARMAR,MR RAHUL DEV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected Tetra Oraon's bail application in a case involving the death of a mentally disturbed woman found in his garden. The court found that unlike three co-accused who were granted bail, Oraon's case was distinguishable because his confessional statement identified the co-accused and blood-stained weapons were recovered from him upon his disclosure, making his case more serious. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected Tetra Oraon's bail application in a case involving the death of a mentally disturbed woman found in his garden. The court found that unlike three co-accused who were granted bail, Oraon's case was distinguishable because his confessional statement identified the co-accused and blood-stained weapons were recovered from him upon his disclosure, making his case more serious. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case