NITESH ORAON vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN — B.A./4982/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),118(I),117(2),109(I),303(2),308(3),352,351(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010178252026

Filing Number

B.A./11513/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4982/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),118(I),117(2),109(I),303(2),308(3),352,351(2),3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITESH ORAON

    Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,RAJESH KR SINGH,RAJESH KR SINGH, ,CHANDAN KUMAR,ASHISH KUMAR SINHA,SAKET KUMAR PANDEY,ARPANA PRIYADARSHINI,KUMAR NISHANT,RAJESH KR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Nitesh Oraon, accused in an assault case involving a demand for Rs. 5,000 for liquor consumption. The court found the petitioner's implication was solely based on a co-accused's confessional statement, and released him on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount each, noting the weak manner of implication against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4982/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Nitesh Oraon, accused in an assault case involving a demand for Rs. 5,000 for liquor consumption. The court found the petitioner's implication was solely based on a co-accused's confessional statement, and released him on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount each, noting the weak manner of implication against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case